|
CONTENTS
Introduction
PART I
Section I
Of the Right of Property in Land as derived
from the Law of Nature
-
Each individual derives from the right
of general occupancy a right to an equal share of the soil
-
This right cannot be precluded by any
possession of others
-
Nor is it tacitly renounced by those
who have had no opportunity of entering upon it.
-
The opportunity of claiming this right
ought to be reserved for every citizen
-
Rude societies have respected this right;
in the progress of arts it is overlooked, and by conquests generally subverted
-
Speculative reasoners have confounded
this equal right with that which is founded in labour, and ascertained by
municipal law
-
The right of a landholder to an extensive
estate must be founded chiefly in labour
-
The progress of cultivation gives an
ascendant to the right of labour over that of general occupancy
-
But the public good requires that both
should be respected and combined together
-
Such combination is difficult, and has
rarely been established for any length of time
-
It is the proper object of Agrarian
laws, and effectual means of establishing it may be devised
-
The value of an estate in land consists
of three parts — the original, the improved, and the improvable value
-
The original and the improvable value
of a great estate still belong to the community, the improved alone to the
landholder
-
The original value is the proper subject
of land-taxes; the improvable value may be separated from the improved,
and ought to be still open to the claims of the community
Section II
Of the Right of Property in Land as founded
on Public Utility
-
Public happiness is the object of good
government; it is not always increased by increased wealth and dominion
-
Nor by increase of numbers
-
The happiness of citizens bears proportion
to their virtue; some situations are favourable to virtue, that of the independent
cultivator more especially is so
- Men in that situation increase more in number
-
And by their industry most effectually
promote the real wealth of the public
-
Comeliness and strength are the least
equivocal marks of prosperity in a race of people
- In these respects the race of cultivators excel
-
To increase the number of men in this
situation, seems to increase public happiness
-
The natural rights and best interests
of men require the same economy of property in land
-
Other plans for increasing happiness
ought to be postponed to independent cultivation
-
Manufactures and commerce in particular
ought to be postponed to it
-
If every field is cultivated by its
proprietor, and every person who chooses it may become proprietor of a field,
the highest public prosperity may be said to be obtained
Section III
Of the Abuses and Pernicious Effects of
that Exorbitant
Right of Property in Land which the Municipal
Laws of Europe have established
- The actual state of Europe, with respect to property
in land, the cultivation of the soil, and the prosperity of the lower ranks,
is very different from what might be desired
- The imperfection of this state arises from that right
to the improvable value of the soil which landholders possess
- The oppression proceeding from this right debases the
spirit and corrupts the probity of the lower ranks
- The rent which may be taken for land ought to be submitted
to regulations not less than the interest of money
- It is of more importance that regulations should be imposed
on property in land
- And though difficult, not impracticable
- Property in land, as at present established in Europe,
is a monopoly of the most pernicious kind
- By this monopoly, population is rendered almost stationary
in Europe
- It checks the progress of agriculture in fertilising
the earth
- Under its influence the increase of population tends
to diminish happiness, and the celibacy of particular orders cannot be called
a political evil
- The interest of landholders is substituted for that of
the community; it ought to be the same, but is not
- The landholders of a nation levy the most oppressive
of all taxes; they receive the most unmerited of all pensions, — if tithes
are oppressive to industry, rents capable of being raised from time to time
are much more so
- All property ought to be the reward of industry; all
industry ought to be secured of its full reward; the exorbitant right: of
the landholders subverts both these maxims of good policy
- It is the indirect influence of this monopoly which makes
a poor-rate necessary; requires unnatural severity in penal laws; renders
sumptuary laws unpolitical, and the improvement of machinery for facilitating
labour unpopular, and perhaps pernicious
- While such a monopoly subsists, emigration ought to be
left free, if not facilitated
- The oppressed state of the cultivators, being universal,
has been regarded by themselves and others as necessary and irremediable
- A sound policy respecting property in land is perhaps
the greatest improvement that can be made in human affairs
- It might restore a sinking state
PART II
Section I
Of Circumstances and Occasions favourable
to a complete
Reformation of the Laws respecting Property in Land,
by the sovereign or legislative power
- Reformation in this important point is not to be despaired
of; the establishment of property in land has changed, and may hereafter
receive other innovations
- Conquering princes might establish the most equitable
and beneficial system in countries subdued by their arms
- In new colonies it ought to be established by the parent
state
- In small dependent states the sovereign of a great nation
may establish it without danger
- Princes of heroic minds, born to absolute monarchy, might
establish a complete reformation in their whole dominions at once
Section II
Of Circumstances and Occasions favourable
to a partial
Reformation of the Laws respecting Property in Land,
by the sovereign or legislative power
-
Absolute monarchs might without difficulty
establish many regulations of partial yet very extensive reformation
-
The whole community may be disposed
to adopt the most beneficial plans for public good
-
Under cover of other regulations some
changes favourable to cultivation may be introduced
-
Certain regulations particularly require,
and may justify such changes
-
The regulation of leases is not unusual,
and might be made productive of the best effects
-
A right of redemption might be given
to the cultivators of any estate exposed to sale
-
Forfeited and escheated lands might
be made the subject of beneficial establishments
Section III
Of Circumstances which might induce the
rulers of a State
to turn their wishes and endeavours towards the
accomplishment of such a Change
- The collective body of the people, if at any time their
power shall predominate, ought above all things to insist on a just regulation
of property in land
- The candidates for disputed thrones might offer this
reformation to the body of the people
- Whatever bodies of men are oppressed in other respects
ought to claim this right also. It might become the ministers of religion
to support it
- Public calamities may induce rulers of a state to think
of renovating the vigour of the community by a just regulation of property
in land
- Imminent and continual dangers may have the same effect
- And the accumulation of public debts ought to have it
Section IV
Of Public Institutions calculated for
promoting a gradual
and salutary Change in the state of Property in Land
-
A board instituted for that purpose
might promote the independence of cultivation by calm and silent operations
-
Premiums might produce some effect,
as in affairs of inferior importance
Section V
Of such examples and beginnings of reformation
as might
be expected from the generous efforts of private persons
acting singly
- In the management of a great estate, various measures
favourable to independent cultivation might be very prudently introduced
- And in the settlement of an entail on liberal principles
- Some examples and beginnings may be obtained by charitable
bequests and foundations
- And by the liberality of opulent individuals
Section VI
Of such examples and beginnings of reformation
as might
be produced by the combined endeavours of
private persons
- The joint contribution of many might effect what individuals
cannot attempt
- The attentions of societies for the encouragement of
agriculture might be extended to this, the most effectual encouragement
of all
Section VII
Of a progressive Agrarian law, which might
be made the
basis of all partial and occasional reformation
respecting property in land
- Scheme of a progressive Agrarian law, exhibited in detail
- Peculiar advantages of such a scheme
-
Variations by which it might be accommodated
to the interests of various orders
- Modifications more particularly adapted to different
countries
-
The inconveniences that cannot be separated
from such innovations would be more than compensated by probable advantages
|